A story I wrote about in December is receiving some pick-up today, thanks to CNN.
A few people asked why I began looking into the BlackLivesMatter1 page, and it started in September when I was researching a fake news site called the Jackson Telegraph. A Facebook user named "Mai Lee" posted a story from the Jackson Telegraph (titled "Black Tuscaloosa man charged after making fist into gun shape & farting near officers") in a Black Lives Matter group. And that group was linked to the BlackLivesMatter1 page.
Originally, I was trying to figure out if there was a link between the BlackLives group and the Jackson Telegraph. I don't believe they were linked, although I do suspect the person (or one of the persons) running the Jackson Telegraph was Australian.
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Facebook. Show all posts
Tuesday, April 10, 2018
Sunday, March 11, 2018
The biggest Black Lives Matter page on Facebook is spreading fake news
In December, I reported that the biggest Black Lives Matter page on Facebook, facebook.com/blacklivesmatter1, was a sham. After I published my story, BlackLivesMatter1 took down its Shop page and removed its Donate buttons. However, the BlackLivesMatter1 page remains popular, with over 694,000 followers. (You can read my original story here.)
Yesterday, BlackLivesMatter1 began posting links to a new domain: BlackLivesMatterMedia.com. This domain contains embedded links to news stories, and it basically acts as a middleman between the headlines on BlackLivesMatter1 and the news sites.
The very first article embedded on BlackLivesMatterMedia was a fake news story from BreakingNews247.net, claiming that an old photo of the 1936 Yankees showed the players kneeling in protest during the National Anthem. Snopes debunked this story back in November, and several commenters on the BlackLivesMatter1 Facebook page called out the story as fake. Nevertheless, the post has been shared 867 times and liked 1,678 times.
This isn't the first time BlackLivesMatter1 has amplified fake news. A post in December claimed the city of Chicago was under martial law. Most notably, the page shared a 4Chan meme claiming the dab was "a secret White Supremacist signal." That post (which is still up) has been shared over 7,400 times:
There is a "DONATE" page on BlackLivesMatterMedia.com, where you can give money in order to help boost the stories on Facebook. (I won't link directly to the donation page, but you can view an archive here.) The "Buy Now" button takes you to PayPal. A drop-down menu shows dollar amounts ranging from $4.99 to $4,999.99.
It's a free country, and if folks want to give money to a sketchy, anonymous Facebook page, that's their right. I just hope anyone who's thinking of giving money to BlackLivesMatter1 (AKA "Black Lives Matter Media") will do some research first.
Yesterday, BlackLivesMatter1 began posting links to a new domain: BlackLivesMatterMedia.com. This domain contains embedded links to news stories, and it basically acts as a middleman between the headlines on BlackLivesMatter1 and the news sites.
There is a "DONATE" page on BlackLivesMatterMedia.com, where you can give money in order to help boost the stories on Facebook. (I won't link directly to the donation page, but you can view an archive here.) The "Buy Now" button takes you to PayPal. A drop-down menu shows dollar amounts ranging from $4.99 to $4,999.99.
Saturday, December 2, 2017
The largest "Black Lives Matter" page on Facebook is probably a sham
There's a Black Lives Matter page on Facebook with 695,000 followers. I'll refer to it as BlackLivesMatter1, because the URL is www.facebook.com/blacklivesmatter1.
695,000 people is a big following. By comparison, the verified "Black Lives Matter" Facebook page has a bit over 300,000 followers.
The page's timeline is filled with memes, photos, and news headlines relevant to the Black Lives Matter movement. However, the person running BlackLivesMatter1 has occasionally gone off message and posted items that were either false or cooked up by trolls:
BlackLivesMatter1 has also shared headlines from partisan right-wing sites like TruthFeedNews.com and USAForToday.com. On the surface, this doesn't make sense. It's like whoever runs BlackLivesMatter1 doesn't pay attention to the details of what they post.
Another strange feature is that, whenever BlackLivesMatter1 posts a headline, the outbound link doesn't go to the actual news source. Instead the link goes to an aggregation site, www.blacklivesmatter.media, which has a layout similar to Reddit. A pop-up immediately asks you to subscribe to a newsletter (see below). After closing the pop-up, you have to scroll past two rows of AdChoices, then click the headline again to finally view the story. My understanding is that blacklivesmatter.media and the BlackLivesMatter1 Facebook page are controlled by the same people.
The domain blacklivesmatter.media was registered by an Australian man named Ian Mackay on October 15, 2016, using the e-mail address blacklivesmatter1@hotmail.com. I sent Ian an e-mail back in September inquiring about BlackLivesMatter1, but it wasn't until this past Monday that I finally reached him on the phone. We had a brief, static-filled conversation. Later, Ian e-mailed me and explained that, while he was the original owner of blacklivesmatter.media, he was "not the only person" associated with the site. He therefore wanted to run any questions I had by some other people first.
Among other things, I was curious how much money BlackLivesMatter1 has raised through its various DonorBox pages, including (but not limited to): Black Lives Matter, Black Lives Matter Media, Black Lives Matter Membership, Standing Rock Support, and Scholarship Program 1. These pages don't have any ongoing tallies, but I found many examples of people sharing links to them on Twitter and Facebook:
BlackLivesMatter1 doesn't try to organize rallies or affect politics. Instead, their mission is to expose racism, and they accomplish that by sharing stories on social media. In theory, it's an admirable goal, but parts of the presentation made me suspicious. For instance, the About section on Facebook says: "We put every spare dollar we have into paid ads on Facebook to boost the most shocking stories." The main DonorBox page goes further, claiming:
I wound up sending Ian Mackay 10 questions, many of which focused on financial matters: I asked if it's true BlackLivesMatter1 faces a legal attack from the right-wing media. I asked how much money BlackLivesMatter1 has raised through its Donorbox pages. I asked for an estimate of how much money BlackLivesMatter1 has made through the combination of AdSense, MyBigCommerce, and Patreon. And I asked how much money BlackLivesMatter1 has spent boosting stories on Facebook.
I also lobbed some softballs, like "Do you consider yourself to be part of the Black Lives Matter movement?" and "What ethnicity are you?"
Several things happened after I sent the e-mail. The BlackLivesMatter1 Facebook page removed its "Donate" button. The About page on Facebook was edited, and a couple external links to blacklivesmatter.media and blacklivesmattergifts.com were deleted. Most of the DonorBox pages disappeared. The previous 8 months' worth of newsletters sent by BlackLivesMatter1 were erased from the email campaign archive. And the "Donate" button was removed from the blacklivesmatter.media homepage.
I'll go out on a limb here and say those things wouldn't have happened if BlackLivesMatter1 were a legitimate group.
On Wednesday, Ian sent another e-mail:
695,000 people is a big following. By comparison, the verified "Black Lives Matter" Facebook page has a bit over 300,000 followers.
The page's timeline is filled with memes, photos, and news headlines relevant to the Black Lives Matter movement. However, the person running BlackLivesMatter1 has occasionally gone off message and posted items that were either false or cooked up by trolls:
BlackLivesMatter1 has also shared headlines from partisan right-wing sites like TruthFeedNews.com and USAForToday.com. On the surface, this doesn't make sense. It's like whoever runs BlackLivesMatter1 doesn't pay attention to the details of what they post.
Another strange feature is that, whenever BlackLivesMatter1 posts a headline, the outbound link doesn't go to the actual news source. Instead the link goes to an aggregation site, www.blacklivesmatter.media, which has a layout similar to Reddit. A pop-up immediately asks you to subscribe to a newsletter (see below). After closing the pop-up, you have to scroll past two rows of AdChoices, then click the headline again to finally view the story. My understanding is that blacklivesmatter.media and the BlackLivesMatter1 Facebook page are controlled by the same people.
The domain blacklivesmatter.media was registered by an Australian man named Ian Mackay on October 15, 2016, using the e-mail address blacklivesmatter1@hotmail.com. I sent Ian an e-mail back in September inquiring about BlackLivesMatter1, but it wasn't until this past Monday that I finally reached him on the phone. We had a brief, static-filled conversation. Later, Ian e-mailed me and explained that, while he was the original owner of blacklivesmatter.media, he was "not the only person" associated with the site. He therefore wanted to run any questions I had by some other people first.
Among other things, I was curious how much money BlackLivesMatter1 has raised through its various DonorBox pages, including (but not limited to): Black Lives Matter, Black Lives Matter Media, Black Lives Matter Membership, Standing Rock Support, and Scholarship Program 1. These pages don't have any ongoing tallies, but I found many examples of people sharing links to them on Twitter and Facebook:
BlackLivesMatter1 doesn't try to organize rallies or affect politics. Instead, their mission is to expose racism, and they accomplish that by sharing stories on social media. In theory, it's an admirable goal, but parts of the presentation made me suspicious. For instance, the About section on Facebook says: "We put every spare dollar we have into paid ads on Facebook to boost the most shocking stories." The main DonorBox page goes further, claiming:
We also help people who can't get support otherwise that are victims of hate crimes or have been affected by racism...we can't often help them financially but try our best to get them free legal advice or some place to stay with one of our network, we now also face a legal attack ourselves from the right wing media outlets trying to silence usIn addition to soliciting donations, BlackLivesMatter1 makes money by selling items through its online shop. The Facebook page is strewn with commerce links for t-shirts, hoodies, and baseball caps. These orders are processed through MyBigCommerce (which is similar to Shopify), and many of the listings have a parenthetical message: "Proceeds donated to expose racism." There's also a Patreon page for BlackLivesMatter1 (set up in September), with four patrons.
I wound up sending Ian Mackay 10 questions, many of which focused on financial matters: I asked if it's true BlackLivesMatter1 faces a legal attack from the right-wing media. I asked how much money BlackLivesMatter1 has raised through its Donorbox pages. I asked for an estimate of how much money BlackLivesMatter1 has made through the combination of AdSense, MyBigCommerce, and Patreon. And I asked how much money BlackLivesMatter1 has spent boosting stories on Facebook.
I also lobbed some softballs, like "Do you consider yourself to be part of the Black Lives Matter movement?" and "What ethnicity are you?"
Several things happened after I sent the e-mail. The BlackLivesMatter1 Facebook page removed its "Donate" button. The About page on Facebook was edited, and a couple external links to blacklivesmatter.media and blacklivesmattergifts.com were deleted. Most of the DonorBox pages disappeared. The previous 8 months' worth of newsletters sent by BlackLivesMatter1 were erased from the email campaign archive. And the "Donate" button was removed from the blacklivesmatter.media homepage.
I'll go out on a limb here and say those things wouldn't have happened if BlackLivesMatter1 were a legitimate group.
On Wednesday, Ian sent another e-mail:
Hi Jeremy,
As I told you I a m the original owner but there are others associated with it now as I buy and sell a lot of domain names as a hobby. I passed your details and questions on to who I think has it now, hopefully they can help you. I took a look at your website www.manicnews.com<http://www.manicnews.com> and I do not want my personal or any other of my details published on your website or anywhere else online or otherwise for that matter by you or anyone else, I'd like to make that clear. Please let me know if there is anything further.
I never received an e-mail from the "others," and a follow-up exchange with Ian yielded no new information.
My hunch is that whoever currently runs BlackLivesMatter1 is trying to make some money off the back of the Black Lives Matter movement. Still, I'm surprised the page has flown under the media's radar when you consider the current political climate. A few months ago, CNN reported that Russian trolls were posing as Black Lives Matter activists on Facebook and Twitter. One of the trolls' Facebook pages, Blacktivists, had 360,000 likes. which was considered a very big number by CNN's Dylan Byers. I expected, in light of that report, that more people would start paying attention to who runs the popular activist pages on Facebook.
My hunch is that whoever currently runs BlackLivesMatter1 is trying to make some money off the back of the Black Lives Matter movement. Still, I'm surprised the page has flown under the media's radar when you consider the current political climate. A few months ago, CNN reported that Russian trolls were posing as Black Lives Matter activists on Facebook and Twitter. One of the trolls' Facebook pages, Blacktivists, had 360,000 likes. which was considered a very big number by CNN's Dylan Byers. I expected, in light of that report, that more people would start paying attention to who runs the popular activist pages on Facebook.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)








