Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Meet the Brownflets: A group of 100% totally real people

Back in 2016, a troll on Twitter named "Heather Brownflet" sent an anti-Semitic death threat to reporter Hadas Gold.  I thought about that troll recently, and a question popped into my head:  What type of name is "Brownflet"?

I began Googling, and a second question popped into my head:  Is there anybody in the United States named "Brownflet"?

I have my doubts.  A search on for the name "Brownflet" doesn't show any results; the closest hit is an Amy Branfladt in California.  Most of the Google results for "Brownflet" lead to social media websites, or else pertain to written records from the 1800's and earlier.

So let's take a look at the social media results.  A Facebook search for people named "Brownflet" yields 45 results.  In my opinion, none of these 45 accounts feel authentic.

Here is Marilyn Brownflet.  She volunteers for the Bernie Sanders campaign, and she attended Colorado State University.  She has 90 friends.  Her entire public timeline consists of sexy pictures of herself.  A Google search for "Marilyn Brownflet" does not show a single result aside from that Facebook page.

Here is Madyson Brownflet.  She attends Murray State College.  She is from Ardmore, Oklahoma.  She posted a few selfies of herself on her public timeline, and nothing else.

Here is Mathaye Brownflet.  She has 13 friends.  Her Intro contains a link-shortened URL, and when I tried visiting it, Facebook told me, "The link you tried to visit goes against our Community Standards."

Here is Kathryn Brownflet.  She posted three pictures of herself on her public timeline, and nothing else.

Here is Aimee Brownflet.  She uses a stock image.

Here is Jade Brownflet.  She also uses a stock image.

Here is Anita Brownflet.  She uses another stock image.

Here is Carol Brownflet.  I did a reverse-image search of her profile picture and saw it had appeared on multiple other websites.

Here is Sandy Brownflet.  Sandy is apparently NBA superstar Steph Curry:

The remaining 36 "Brownflets" don't have profile pictures.  I put their names and account URLs into a spreadsheet for reference.

On Twitter, I saw 23 accounts named "Brownflet."   I looked over the accounts, and, once again, none of them struck me as authentic.  Many of the accounts were spamming shady links or trying to get Snapchat subscribers.  A lot of the accounts had no activity.

If nobody is named "Brownflet"  in real life, then why would the name be prevalent on social media?  Well, I have a theory:  Among the Google results for "Brownflet," there was a page titled "Faire Names for English Folk."  It's a list of  late-sixteenth-century English names, suitable for use during Renaissance faires.  The list contains over 1,000 surnames, many of which are still common today:  Arnold, Fisher, Mason, West, etc...  Other names sound particularly old-fashioned, such as Buslingthorpe, Launceleyn, and Pennebrygg.  When I searched for those latter surnames on Facebook, I got the same vibe as when I searched for "Brownflet."

Here are results for Buslingthorpe:

And Launceleyn:

And Pennebrygg:

I looked through these additional Facebook profiles and didn't get the feeling any of them were authentic.  Also, I noticed the Facebook pages for Kathryn Brownflet and Kathryn Launceleyn both had pictures of the same girl in different clothes.  (Go figure.) 

Going back to my theory:  I suspect that, in the far reaches of the internet, there's a group of fraudsters pumping out an army of fake social media accounts.  At some point, these fraudsters stumbled onto a list of old-fashioned English surnames and plugged those names into whatever program they were running.  What these fraudsters failed to realize is that many of the English surnames are no longer in common use.  Thus, when you search for these names on social media, most of the results seem fake.  

Sunday, March 3, 2019

Why did Engadget think is a Russian propaganda site?

Last month, Engadget and Point ran an investigation that found Russian propaganda is still "a big problem for Reddit."  The piece highlighted three domains alleged to be Russian propaganda:,, and  These sites were supposedly being spammed in dozens of different subreddits:    

As I read the Engadget article, I paid close attention to how the author, Benjamin Plackett, concluded that the domains were indeed Russian propaganda.

For, he cited an academic paper by researcher Jessikka Aro.

For, he cited a 2017 report from Politico.

For, he cited an article on ThinkProgress by Casey Michel, titled: "Why did Columbus Nova register websites aimed at young white supremacists?"  Columbus Nova is a New York-based company with business ties to the Russian conglomerate Renova, which in turn is run by the Russian billionaire Viktor Vekselberg. 

Here's where things get murky:  In his article, Michel noted that Columbus Nova registered several domains with variations of the phrase "alt-right."  These included:,, and  Michel also wrote:
There’s no evidence any material ever existed on the sites, and all of them return an error message.
That line caught my attention, because is clearly an active website.  Furthermore, the Internet Archive shows was active in 2017 and 2018, which is in contradiction with Michel's observation. 

So here's what I think happened:  Casey Michel made a typo.  (He probably meant to type or  And Engadget took the typo at face value.

As far as I can tell, is a run-of-the-mill nationalist website.  The masthead lists "Brandon Martinez" and "Charlemagne" as the chief editors.  You can watch interviews on YouTube with them.  Brandon Martinez has an Amazon page, and his author bio says he's Canadian.  I don't see any obvious Russian connection.  Granted, it's not great if people on Reddit are sharing alt-right material, but that isn't the same thing as promoting Russian propaganda.  I think the distinction is important.

Unfortunately I don't have an active subscription on Whoisology right now, so I can't dive into the historical WHOIS records for  (I'd want to check if it was ever registered to the e-mail address   The current WHOIS page for shows it's registered with a proxy service, but that record may have changed over time.    

I'm going to reach out to Engadget and see if they can fact-check whether was ever registered to Columbus Nova.  I'll update this post if they respond.  

Saturday, March 2, 2019

Describing Michael Tracey in two words or less

Michael Tracey recently appeared on Hill TV's Rising With Krystal & Buck to discuss Bernie Sanders.  Here are two headlines The Hill used when posting clips of the interview:

Left-leaning journalist: Sanders would be 'formidable candidate' against Trump

News media has sought to 'delegitimize' Tulsi Gabbard, says liberal journalist

It just struck me as funny how the person writing those headlines decided to stress that Michael Tracey was "left-leaning" and "liberal."  The reason Tracey appeared on the program was because he'd written an opinion piece for The Federalist in which he explained why many of the left's criticisms of Bernie Sanders were not valid.  

The full 12-minute interview from Hill TV was posted with the headline:  "Journalist Michael Tracey explains why Sanders is 'formidable' 2020 contender"

Hill TV interview with Michael Tracey
I'm not too familiar with Krystal & Buck, although Buck did describe himself at the start of the interview as being on the right:
So there's some really interesting takes on the left--and I'm saying this as somebody from the right--about where Sanders fits into this whole picture.  

Tuesday, February 26, 2019

Tim Pool and the "Incel Rebellion" debate

This is something I've meant to write for a while.  It's about Tim Pool and his commentary in the wake of the Toronto van attack.

If you don't know who Tim Pool is, he's a journalist and YouTube personality who gained prominence in 2011 while documenting the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations.  Pool's two YouTube channels have a combined 580,000 subscribers and 128 million views, and he uploads about five videos each day.  The videos mainly consist of Tim's commentary about the news, but he also mixes in interviews and live-streaming from protests and rallies.

Tim Pool on his YouTube channel
Tim Pool worked at Vice for a while, and then he worked for Fusion.  Evidently the culture at Fusion left a terrible impression on Pool, and lot of his commentary is now focused on highlighting what he perceives as the mistakes of mainstream liberal medianot just at Fusion, but at CNN, BuzzFeed, the Huffington Post, etc...  Thus, you'll find videos on his channel like "If We Are Going to Ban Fake News Lets Start With CNN," and "BuzzFeed Tried to Call Out The 'Far Right' and Got It Wrong..

I consider these videos a guilty pleasure, but I often get the nagging feeling something is "off" with Pool's criticism.  For instance, in that video where he suggests CNN is fake news, he brings up the time when Don Lemon cited speculation on Twitter that Malaysian Flight 370 could've been swallowed by a black hole.  It was certainly an eye-rolling moment, but I viewed it more as an awkward segue on Don Lemon's part than as some classic example of "fake news."  The problem is that it was the type of moment which can be interpreted subjectivelyand whether it's "fake news" depends on your personal opinion of CNN.  For this post, I want to focus on something objective Tim Pool covered.  Something which was definitely real or definitely fake.

The attack:

On the afternoon of April 23rd, 2018,  a man drove a Ryder van onto the sidewalk of Yonge Street in Toronto.  He struck multiple pedestrians, killing 10 and injuring 16 others.  He was then arrested following a brief stand-off with police:

The attack started shortly before 1:30 PM, local time.  At around 5:20 PM, the police identified the suspect:  25-year-old Alek Minassian.  Shortly thereafter, some screenshots, along with archived pages, began circulating online that allegedly showed Alek Minassian's Facebook profile.  The profile contained the following status update, timestamped at 1:27 PM:
Private (Recruit) Minassian Infantry 00010, wishing to speak to Sgt 4chan please. C23249161.  The Incel Rebellion has already begun!  We will overthrow all the Chads and Stacys!  All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!
The implication was that Alek Minassian considered himself an incel (short for "involuntary celibate") and that he'd committed the violence in honor of Elliot Rodger, who in 2014 killed six people (and then himself) in Isla Vista, California.  Rodger filmed a video prior to the murders in which he blamed his unhappiness on his lack of success with women and vowed to exact revenge.

Many peoplemyself includedwere originally skeptical about the legitimacy of the "Incel Rebellion" post.  It sounded like a hoax 4Chan might spread in the wake of a tragic event.  However, several journalists reached out to Facebook and received confirmation the page was real.  For instance, here's a tweet from BuzzFeed's Jane Lytvynentko:
Granted, just because the Facebook page was "real," that doesn't mean Alek Minassian himself wrote the post.  But this seemed to dispel the idea of the Facebook page itself being a hoax.  Tim Pool, however, took a look at the story and wasn't convinced.

In four different YouTube videos, Tim Pool asserted his belief that the Alek Minassian Facebook page was a hoax, and that the media was spreading a fake narrative.  He even said the journalists spreading this type of fake narrative were "evil."

Pool first mentioned the Facebook post in an April 29th video, titled: "Incel Revolution: Was an 'Involuntary celibate' behind Toronto Attack?"
I’ve been doing a lot of digging and looking into it, and I really believe this story is entirely fake.  There's basically no evidence to suggest this is actually an incel...I think it is fair to say the media is running with a fake story and I think it is fair to say that this Facebook page is a hoax.
Pool was more emphatic in a May 18th video, titled: "The Truth about Everything."
This is fake news....I bet everything, I bet my car, that this incels thing is fake news....Somebody made a Facebook profile and then added a post where it was just one photo....There were no friends on this profile.  It looked like a brand new profile with two posts.  And one of those posts was this guy saying that he was an incel.  You can edit the dates on posts.  You can edit your page, and make it look like you posted something months ago.  And that’s all it was...There is absolutely no reason to believe this is true...It was an archive that's highly dubious, that was probably made by some trolls.  We have no reason to believe it's true.  There's no confirmation. Yet it will go down in history that this man was an incel like many of these other shooters, like Elliot Rodger....When the New York Times runs a story where they say Alek Minassian was an incel, that's not the truth....A fake profile is not proof.
Pool was near exasperation in a May 19th video, titled: "Is This The Breaking Point / Is Truth Really Over?"
There isn't any truth...You've got people who are ideologically driven, who are just going to push the narrative that they want to exist.  These people, in my opinion, really are evil...  What [the media is] doing is publishing unconfirmed rumor and a potential hoax as a fact.  Because what constitutes facts these days?  Apparently, very little.  Going back in time, let's talk about this Facebook post.  This is apparently a post from the attacker saying 'The Incel Rebellion has begun.  All hail Supreme Gentleman Elliott Rodger.' Following that story, there was a wave of news articles from various mainstream outlets, talking about how incels were dangerous, they were the new boogeymen, and definitively stating that this guy, this Alek Minassian, was an incel, based off of this highly dubious archive of a Facebook post.
Pool talked about the story again in a May 22nd video, titled:  "I'm Fed up with these people."  
Let's look at the incel thing with the Toronto attacker.  Alek Minassian.  Everyone's reporting that he was an incel.  What three sources do you have to confirm this is true?  Nothing.  An archive of a Facebook post?  That's it.  And all of a sudden it's fact.  New York Times talks all about it, all these different outlets confirming it to be true.  That's not confirmation.  I'm sorry.  Standards are out the window.  You've got these crazy people who are just lying...
When I first watched these videos, I genuinely thought Tim Pool was on to something.  So I dug into the story myself, and...for the life of me, I couldn't figure out how Tim Pool reached the conclusion that he did.  In my judgement, the evidence all suggested the Facebook profile was real.

My first step was to gather the various screenshots and archives floating around social media.  I found three distinct screenshots.

Screenshot 1: 

The earliest appearance of this screenshot was in a 4Chan thread on April 23rd at 5:58 PM, Eastern time.  The screenshot shows a Telus phone, displaying a time of 3:15 PM.  Two of Alek Minassian’s posts are visible.  The “Incel Rebellion” post has a "1 hr" timestamp.  The other post says “Alek Minassian updated his profile picture” and is dated March 10th.

For the record, this 4Chan screenshot appears to be a second-hand version of someone else's screenshot.  Catherine McDonald, a reporter for Global News Toronto, shared what was essentially the same screenshot on Twitter a couple hours later, but without the second-hand characteristics.  A CBC broadcast that night showed a sharper version of what was essentially the same screenshot as well:

Screenshot 2:

This was posted in a thread on, and it also appeared in a Heavy article.  The screenshot shows a Rogers phone, displaying a time of 3:10 PM.  Two of Minassian’s timeline posts are visible.  The details on those posts are the same as in screenshot #1.  Screenshot #2 also shows the names and partial profile pictures of three of Minassian’s Facebook friends:  Hasan Ayub, Brandon Levine, and Christopher Maté:

Screenshot 3:  

This was embedded in an ABC News article on April 24th.  The screenshot shows a desktop version of Minassian’s Facebook profile.  The Intro section is visible.  It says Minassian was studying at Seneca College of Applied Arts & Technology, and that he attended Thornlea Secondary School.  The Friends section is visible and indicates Minassian had 11 friends, although the names and pictures of the friends are blurred out.  Two of Minassian’s timeline posts are visible:  The post referencing an “Incel Rebellion” has a “2 hrs” timestamp:

Archive 1:  

This was an snapshot of Minassian's Facebook page.  The Intro section says:  "Studies at Seneca College of Applied Arts & Technology" and "Went to Thornlea Secondary School."  Two of Alek Minassian's timeline posts are visible.  If you take your cursor and hover over the timestamp of the "Incel Rebellion" post, it shows a time of 17:27 UTC (1:27 PM local time) on April 23rd, 2018.  The older timeline post, with Minassian's profile picture, has a timestamp of 18:39 UTC (1:39 PM local time)  on March 10th, 2018.  The snapshot itself was created at 19:59 UTC (3:59 PM local time) on April 23rd, 2018:

Archive 2:

This was an snapshot of Minassian's Facebook page.  Under Professional Skills, he listed "Software development."  Under Education, he listed "Seneca College of Applied Arts & Technology, Sep 2011 to Apr 2018 · Toronto, Ontario," and "Thornlea Secondary School, Class of 2011 · Thornhill, Ontario."  This archive shows how Minassian's profile would appear to somebody who wasn't logged into Facebook:

All of the above screenshots and archives are compatible with each other.  I don't see any contradictions.  So now I'm going to review some of the claims Tim Pool made in his YouTube videos and explain why they don't make sense.

Claim #1:  You can edit the times and dates of your Facebook posts.

This is the major one.  If you can edit the times and dates of your Facebook posts, then a troll could conceivably have written the "Incel Rebellion" post after the attack occurred.  To test this theory, I ran an experiment.  I made a post "predicting" the results of Super Bowl 53, and then I backdated my post to 2:30 PM EST on the day of the game:

Two things immediately became clear.  First, a clock icon appeared next to the timestamp when I backdated my post.  The same clock icon even appeared in an snapshot of my post:  Second, I had to choose from among 10-minute increments when setting the time:  2:00 PM, 2:10 PM, 2:20 PM, etc...  So the new timestamp would only show a time ending in "0."

There was no clock icon on either of Alek Minassian's two Facebook posts, and the timestamps ended in a "7" and a "9," respectively.  Thus, I don't believe either post was created after the attack:

I realize it's been 10 months since the post was created, and Facebook could have changed its features in that time.  For what it's worth, I ran this experiment with a dummy Facebook account back in May, 2018, and observed the exact same thing.  I also found a conversation on StackExchange from July, 2017, which referenced the clock icon:  A user asked: “Is it possible to backdate a Facebook post WITHOUT the little clock icon indicating that you've done so?”  Another person replied: “No, it is not possible to backdate a Facebook post without the little clock icon indicating that you've done so. That shows the edit history.”  So I don't think the clock icon is a new feature.

Claim #2:  The Facebook profile had no friends, which is a sign of a brand new profile

Two of the screenshots clearly show Minassian had Facebook friends.

I'm going to assume Tim Pool based his observation off the snapshot.  I ran some quick experiments last spring, and I noticed when made a snapshot of somebody's timeline page, it wouldn't display any information about the person's friends listregardless of whether the list was public or private.  So wouldn't be useful on this specific matter.  (You can visit this link to see how snapshots appeared in April and May of last year.)

Claim #3:  The timestamps on the screenshots don't line up with the real-life events

This wasn't an argument Tim Pool made on his own, but I still think it's relevant.  In his video on May 19th, Pool shared an excerpt from a Toronto Star article titled: “Facebook post linked to Alek Minassian cites ‘incel rebellion,’ mass murderer.”  The article explained how “media manipulation experts” were wary about the post’s authenticity:
There were also questions raised about the timing of the post. An archive of the Facebook page appears to show a timestamp of 1:27 p.m. EDT, shortly after police started receiving calls about a van that had jumped the curb and struck pedestrians. An image of the Facebook message, which was posted anonymously to 4chan, suggested it was published at around 2:15 p.m., however, when Minassian would have already been in police custody.
That passage, however, is based on a misunderstanding of how timestamps on Facebook work.  When a timestamp says “1 hr,” it means the post was published more than one hour ago and less than two hours ago.  The 4chan screenshot showed the post had a “1 hr” timestamp at 3:15 PM, meaning the post was published between 1:15 PM and 2:15 PM.  This is consistent with the snapshot that showed a timestamp of 1:27 PM.

I'll cut the Toronto Star some slack in this instance.  Tim Pool, on the other hand, literally makes videos about online hoaxes.  He built his brand on social media.  I would expect him to know how timestamps work, and yet he shared that passage uncritically. 

Claim #4:  There's no reason to believe the post was written by Alek Minassian

There was evidence.

The Facebook post contained two strings of numbers: "00010" and "C23249161."  Alek Minassian enlisted in the Canadian Armed Services in August of 2017, and he completed 16 days of recruit training before requesting his release.  In regards to that first string of numbers, reported: "00010 is the military’s occupation code for non-officer infantrymen."  As for the second string of numbers, the Toronto Star published an article titled: "Number cited in cryptic Facebook post matches Alek Minassian’s military ID: Source."  It explained:
The cryptic numbers in the Facebook post attributed to Alek Minassian — C23249161 — are the same as his service number with the Canadian military, a defence department source confirmed to the Star Wednesday…While many people have questioned the authenticity of the Facebook post — including media manipulation experts, who warned of online hoaxes in the wake of mass killings — few people can access Minassian’s service number, which is akin to a social insurance number and subject to privacy restrictions.
If the Facebook post was a hoax, it would mean the hoaxer somehow knew Minassian's service number.

Claim #5:  There was no confirmation the post was real

As I mentioned earlier, several journalists reached out to Facebook for confirmation.

Here is CBC reporting
Facebook told CBC News that the post from an Alek Minassian was real and was posted publicly on his profile before Facebook shut it down
Facebook confirmed to the BBC that Minassian was the author of a post which read in part: "The Incel Rebellion has already begun! We will overthrow all the Chads and Stacys! All hail the Supreme Gentleman Elliot Rodger!
Here is BuzzFeed News reporting:
In the hours after the attack, an unverified Facebook profile for the suspect emerged with a post referencing the anonymous online forum 4chan, which is often the source of online hate and hoaxes. A Facebook employee speaking on background confirmed to BuzzFeed News that the since-removed profile for the suspect was authentic.
Those sites all said they got confirmation from Facebook that the "Alek Minassian" account was real.  Now, I don't know the exact nature of the confirmation.  There was a statement sent to the media by a Facebook spokesperson and it's unclear if CBC and BBC based their confirmation on that same statement.  The Toronto Star, among other news websites, clearly quoted the Facebook spokesperson:
A spokesperson for Facebook Canada would not answer specific questions about the timing of the post, but said the company believed it was legitimate and deleted the account, which had been made with Minassian’s name and photo. 
“This is a terrible tragedy and our hearts go out to the people who have been affected. There is absolutely no place on our platform for people who commit such horrendous acts,” spokesperson Meg Sinclair said in an email.
Here's the puzzling thing:  Tim Pool showed that same excerpt from the Toronto Star in his May 19th video.  However, twenty seconds later in the same video, he repeated his assertion that the Facebook post was "not confirmed."  So I have to wonder:  Did Tim Pool think the Facebook spokesperson was wrong?  Did he think the Facebook spokesperson was lying?  Did he think the Toronto Star misinterpreted her statement?  If Tim Pool said, 'I don't trust the words of a Facebook spokesperson," then  I could at least understand where he's coming from.  But he doesn't elaborate.

Aside from Facebook officials, there were a few other potential sources of confirmation.  The Toronto Police Service gave a press conference on April 24th, during which Detective Sergeant Graham Gibson acknowledged the "Incel Rebellion" Facebook post.  Sergeant Gibson said the police would be investigating the post, although he stopped short of confirming the post was written by Minassian.  NBC News, for their part, cited law enforcement officials as saying Minassian had an online discussion about Elliot Rodger.

Finally, there was a Toronto Sun article by Joe Warmington, published on April 26, 2018, titled "Accused van killer says in jail that he 'wanted to be shot,' witness says."  The article quoted sources from inside Toronto South Detention Centre who said Alek Minassian was openly discussing the "Incel Rebellion" Facebook post:
And sources confirm Minassian was talking openly about his Facebook post and his disdain for women.
In jail, he reiterated his commitment to the cause — a copycat of a murder in 2014 in California in which Rodger killed six people and wounded 14, blaming others for his still being a virgin. 
One person who spoke with Minassian in the jail said this incident allegedly happened “because he hates the people who deny him sex” and that he “feels no remorse.” 
A source who witnessed exchanges with people in the jail said Minassian said that he “hates the Chads and Stacys,” which is something referenced in the Facebook post.
Is it possible Joe Warmington made up the details in his article?  Sure, I suppose.  The guy doesn't have a stellar reputation: A writer at once called out Warmington for his "shameless hackery."  Another writer at the Toronto Star called Warmington "an embarrassment to our industry."  With that said, the Ontario government treated the article seriously enough to launch an investigation into the apparent leak.

Conclusion, or lack thereof:

The frustrating part about writing this analysis is that I can't be 100% sure the Alek Minassian Facebook account was real.  My hunch is that it was real.  I haven't seen any convincing argument for why it would be a hoax.  Minassian's trial is scheduled to begin in 2020, and I imagine at that point we'll get some definitive confirmation.    

Tim Pool likes to end his videos by saying, "Let me know what you think in the comments below, and we'll keep the conversation going."  I actually looked through the comments of his May 19th YouTube videothere were over 1,000to see if anybody talked about the timestamps.  I found one commenter, named XMAEST, who possibly acknowledged it:

 The majority of the comments, however, were like this:

I sent Pool an e-mail on February 1st and asked if he still thought the Facebook page was a hoax.  The e-mail said:
Hi Tim, 
I'm a regular viewer of your show, and recently I was looking into the controversy from last spring regarding Alek Minassian (the man who allegedly killed 10 people in Toronto). 
The media claimed Minassian was an incel, and the claim was based on an archived Facebook post.  At the time, you said you thought the Facebook post was a hoax.  Has your opinion changed at all since then? 
For what it's worth, I did find a Toronto Sun article from April that implied Minassian was talking about his Facebook post while in jail:  "And sources confirm Minassian was talking openly about his Facebook post and his disdain for women." 
Minassian's trial is set for 2020, so it could be a while before we get a definitive answer, but I was curious to know your current thoughts on the matter.
Pool didn't reply to that e-mail, but I'll update this post if he does and we'll keep the conversation going.

Friday, February 8, 2019

Santa Monica Observer posts false story about Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The Santa Monica Observer published an article titled, "Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Will Retire from the US Supreme Court in January, 2019."

I recently tweeted to the Santa Monica Observer's Twitter account and asked if they still stood by their story, but I didn't get a response:

Tuesday, February 5, 2019

Cast Away trailer

Sometimes I'll be going about my day, and I'll randomly think about how the trailer for Cast Away reveals the ending of the movie--right down to the final shot:

Over on YouTube, a commenter named "Mr. Vulcanator" voiced his displeasure:

Thursday, January 31, 2019

The Daily Beast talks RBG conspiracies

The Daily Beast wrote an article on how QAnon and right-wing commentators have been fueling conspiracy theories regarding Ruth Bader Ginsburg's heath:

The weird thing about the article is that the two authorsWill Sommer Kelly Weilldon't actually give an update about RBG's health; they simply cite a CNN article from nine days ago:
Filmmakers of a new Ginsburg documentary told CNN that they spoke with Ginsburg on Tuesday, and that the Supreme Court justice sounded “strong and cheerful.” “She is writing opinions and continuing to stay on top of work,” the filmmakers said.
Also, the phrasing of that paragraph makes it sound like the filmmakers spoke to RBG two days ago, when it was actually nine days ago, but I'll chalk that up to poor writing.  My point is, I'm just kinda surprised there wasn't, like, a spokesperson for the Supreme Court whom the Daily Beast could reach out to for comment.

For the record, I don't buy into the right-wing conspiracy theories regarding RBGbut I don't think these types of articles from The Daily Beast actually accomplish anything.  (Unless their goal is to eventually get conspiracy theorists like Sebastian Gorka and James Woods suspended from Twitter.)  

I half-expect Ruth Bader Ginsburg to show up at the State of the Union Address with the same type of fanfare as when President Obama released his birth certificate.  Everyone will be gathered in the room, President Trump will be preparing for his speech, and then the lights will dim.  Suddenly, we'll hear the crash of glass and then Stone Cold Steve Austin's theme starts playing, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg will march out to massive applause.

Wednesday, January 30, 2019

These Kelly Weill tweets

I don't get the point of these tweets from Kelly Weill:

I can take an educated guess.  My guess is that Kelly Weill was trying to dunk on Fox News for not adequately covering the arrest and indictment of Roger Stone.

The thing is, I watched Fox News throughout the day on Friday, and they gave plenty of coverage to the Roger Stone story.  I even kept notes for the 10:00 AM hour:  They covered the Stone story from 10:00 AM until 10:16 AM; then they discussed the government shutdown up until 10:38 AM.

I would assume Fox News also discussed the Roger Stone story at the top of the 5:00 PM hour, but I wasn't watching at that specific time....They did have Roger Stone as a guest on Tucker Carlson's show at 8:00 PM, for what it's worth.

I'm just not a fan of tweets that try to dunk on Fox News (or CNN, or MSNBC) by showing a random screenshot.  There's often some missing perspective.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting the tweets.  Maybe Kelly Weill is just agog that The FIVE featured a fluffy Q&A session?  Maybe she's simply exasperated by the fact Dan Bongino is on her TV screen.  (I have no opinion on Dan Bongino whatsoever.)