Saturday, February 10, 2018

Satofficials.com

Come on, Satofficials.com, who are you trying to fool?

Your article from February 9, 2018, is titled: "Why Faking the Moon Landing Was Impossible"

A Popular Mechanics article from October 27, 2017, is titled: "Why Faking the Moon Landing Was Impossible"

Your opening:
It's understandable that many people over the years have questioned the validity of the 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing. It was an incredible, unprecedented triumph for NASA and a monumental achievement for humanity in general—and one we haven't bothered to repeat since the end of Apollo.
The opening from Popular Mechanics:
It's understandable that many people over the years have questioned the validity of the 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing. It was an incredible, unprecedented triumph for NASA and a monumental achievement for humanity in general—and one we haven't bothered to repeat since the end of Apollo.
You're using somebody else's content, and your site has AdSense ads?  That's just sketchy.