Your article from February 9, 2018, is titled: "Why Faking the Moon Landing Was Impossible"
A Popular Mechanics article from October 27, 2017, is titled: "Why Faking the Moon Landing Was Impossible"
Your opening:
It's understandable that many people over the years have questioned the validity of the 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing. It was an incredible, unprecedented triumph for NASA and a monumental achievement for humanity in general—and one we haven't bothered to repeat since the end of Apollo.
The opening from Popular Mechanics:
It's understandable that many people over the years have questioned the validity of the 1969 Apollo 11 moon landing. It was an incredible, unprecedented triumph for NASA and a monumental achievement for humanity in general—and one we haven't bothered to repeat since the end of Apollo.You're using somebody else's content, and your site has AdSense ads? That's just sketchy.






